diff options
| author | Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> | 2007-02-24 11:00:05 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> | 2007-02-24 11:00:05 +0000 |
| commit | 1906cf93f86d8d66f45f90380a8d3da25c087ee5 (patch) | |
| tree | 90916c99abe1f1ec26709ee420e6c349eda4670a /patches/glibc/2.3.5/glibc-2.3.4-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch | |
| parent | 2609573aede4ce198b3462976725b25eb1637d2e (diff) | |
| download | crosstool-ng-1906cf93f86d8d66f45f90380a8d3da25c087ee5.tar.gz crosstool-ng-1906cf93f86d8d66f45f90380a8d3da25c087ee5.tar.bz2 crosstool-ng-1906cf93f86d8d66f45f90380a8d3da25c087ee5.zip | |
Add the full crosstool-NG sources to the new repository of its own.
You might just say: 'Yeah! crosstool-NG's got its own repo!".
Unfortunately, that's because the previous repo got damaged beyond repair and I had no backup.
That means I'm putting backups in place in the afternoon.
That also means we've lost history... :-(
Diffstat (limited to 'patches/glibc/2.3.5/glibc-2.3.4-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | patches/glibc/2.3.5/glibc-2.3.4-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch | 61 |
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/patches/glibc/2.3.5/glibc-2.3.4-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch b/patches/glibc/2.3.5/glibc-2.3.4-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3bbe6ea8 --- /dev/null +++ b/patches/glibc/2.3.5/glibc-2.3.4-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +From http://www.mail-archive.com/pld-cvs-commit@pld-linux.org/msg00229.html +Fixes + rtld.c: In function '_dl_start': + dynamic-link.h:47: error: nested function 'elf_machine_rela_relative' declared but never defined + dynamic-link.h:41: error: nested function 'elf_machine_rela' declared but never defined +when compiling glibc-2.3.4 with gcc-4.0 + +But see also +http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-02/msg00000.html +and +http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-03/msg00008.html +which seem to propose less radical fixes? + +Aha. See also http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=721 + +--- glibc-2.3-20050307/elf/dynamic-link.h.old 2005-03-12 18:12:37.000000000 -0800 ++++ glibc-2.3-20050307/elf/dynamic-link.h 2005-03-12 18:12:59.777820848 -0800 +@@ -19,43 +19,6 @@ + + #include <elf.h> + #include <assert.h> +- +-#ifdef RESOLVE +-/* We pass reloc_addr as a pointer to void, as opposed to a pointer to +- ElfW(Addr), because not all architectures can assume that the +- relocated address is properly aligned, whereas the compiler is +- entitled to assume that a pointer to a type is properly aligned for +- the type. Even if we cast the pointer back to some other type with +- less strict alignment requirements, the compiler might still +- remember that the pointer was originally more aligned, thereby +- optimizing away alignment tests or using word instructions for +- copying memory, breaking the very code written to handle the +- unaligned cases. */ +-auto void __attribute__((always_inline)) +-elf_machine_rel (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc, +- const ElfW(Sym) *sym, const struct r_found_version *version, +- void *const reloc_addr); +-auto void __attribute__((always_inline)) +-elf_machine_rela (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc, +- const ElfW(Sym) *sym, const struct r_found_version *version, +- void *const reloc_addr); +-auto void __attribute__((always_inline)) +-elf_machine_rel_relative (ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc, +- void *const reloc_addr); +-auto void __attribute__((always_inline)) +-elf_machine_rela_relative (ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc, +- void *const reloc_addr); +-# if ELF_MACHINE_NO_RELA || defined ELF_MACHINE_PLT_REL +-auto void __attribute__((always_inline)) +-elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map, +- ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc); +-# else +-auto void __attribute__((always_inline)) +-elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map, +- ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc); +-# endif +-#endif +- + #include <dl-machine.h> + + #ifndef VERSYMIDX |