1 files changed, 0 insertions, 64 deletions
diff --git a/packages/glibc/2.14.1/0039-nis-bogus-conditional.patch b/packages/glibc/2.14.1/0039-nis-bogus-conditional.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 732b859b..00000000
--- a/packages/glibc/2.14.1/0039-nis-bogus-conditional.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,64 +0,0 @@
-commit f88759ea9bd3c8d8fef28f123ba9767cb0e421a3
-Author: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
-Date:   Wed Dec 21 23:44:01 2016 +0000
-
-    Fix nss_nisplus build with mainline GCC (bug 20978).
-    
-    glibc build with current mainline GCC fails because
-    nis/nss_nisplus/nisplus-alias.c contains code
-    
-      if (name != NULL)
-        {
-          *errnop = EINVAL;
-          return NSS_STATUS_UNAVAIL;
-        }
-    
-      char buf[strlen (name) + 9 + tablename_len];
-    
-    producing an error about strlen being called on a pointer that is
-    always NULL (and a subsequent use of that pointer with a %s format in
-    snprintf).
-    
-    As Andreas noted, the bogus conditional comes from a 1997 change:
-    
-    -  if (name == NULL || strlen(name) > 8)
-    -    return NSS_STATUS_NOTFOUND;
-    -  else
-    +  if (name != NULL || strlen(name) <= 8)
-    
-    So the intention is clearly to return an error for NULL name.
-    
-    This patch duly inverts the sense of the conditional.  It fixes the
-    build with GCC mainline, and passes usual glibc testsuite testing for
-    x86_64.  However, I have not tried any actual substantive nisplus
-    testing, do not have an environment for such testing, and do not know
-    whether it is possible that strlen (name) or tablename_len might be
-    large so that the VLA for buf is actually a security issue.  However,
-    if it is a security issue, there are plenty of other similar instances
-    in the nisplus code (that haven't been hidden by a bogus comparison
-    with NULL) - and nis_table.c:__create_ib_request uses strdupa on the
-    string passed to nis_list, so a local fix in the caller wouldn't
-    suffice anyway (see bug 20987).  (Calls to strdupa and other such
-    macros that use alloca must be considered equally questionable
-    regarding stack overflow issues as direct calls to alloca and VLA
-    declarations.)
-    
-            [BZ #20978]
-            * nis/nss_nisplus/nisplus-alias.c (_nss_nisplus_getaliasbyname_r):
-            Compare name == NULL, not name != NULL.
-
----
- nis/nss_nisplus/nisplus-alias.c |    2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
---- a/nis/nss_nisplus/nisplus-alias.c
-+++ b/nis/nss_nisplus/nisplus-alias.c
-@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@
- 	return status;
-     }
- 
--  if (name != NULL)
-+  if (name == NULL)
-     {
-       *errnop = EINVAL;
-       return NSS_STATUS_UNAVAIL;