aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/samples/i586-geode-linux-uclibc
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Robet P. J. DAY: typoes.Yann E. MORIN"2008-02-141-1/+1
|
* Update the samples to the new set of options (not changing the configuration).Yann E. MORIN"2008-01-161-8/+12
|
* Update the i586-geode-linux-uclibc sample.Yann E. MORIN"2007-09-061-9/+16
|
* Update all samples to the latest set of options (because so much as changed ↵Yann E. MORIN"2007-08-151-100/+9
| | | | since we dropped the core C compiler and many obsolete versions).
* Remove any reference to libfloat. That has gone once and for all.Yann E. MORIN"2007-07-301-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | Rationale: Most of the time, soft-float problems are caused by this sucker of gcc: it has support for soft float for all of the targets I've tried so far, but does not activate this code until you dwelve into half a dozen of files to make it accept to build and link the support code... So, yes: gcc has soft-float support. And again, yes: gcc is a sucker.
* Update the samples to the latest option set.Yann E. MORIN"2007-07-241-8/+53
|
* Update the i586-geode-linux-uclibc sample.Yann E. MORIN"2007-07-082-35/+124
|
* Make the progress bar a default for all samples.Yann E. MORIN"2007-06-191-1/+1
|
* Update the way we handle directories supplied by the user:Yann E. MORIN"2007-05-101-4/+3
| | | | | | | - the tarball directory is considered as a local copy, and tarballs are copied to a working area, - the sources and build directories (CT_SRC_DIR and CT_BUILD_DIR) are now computed, and no longer an option, - the build dir has been renamed from 'build' to 'targets'. That should ease preparing a tarball of the resulting target.
* Update the i586-geode-linux-uclibc sample.Yann E. MORIN"2007-05-072-1997/+54
|
* Update i586-geode-linux-uclibc sample:Yann E. MORIN"2007-03-043-374/+682
| | | | | - use uClibc-0.9.28.3 - use linux-2.6.20 for kernel headers
* Add the full crosstool-NG sources to the new repository of its own.Yann E. MORIN"2007-02-243-0/+2066
You might just say: 'Yeah! crosstool-NG's got its own repo!". Unfortunately, that's because the previous repo got damaged beyond repair and I had no backup. That means I'm putting backups in place in the afternoon. That also means we've lost history... :-(