From 6c368af5b4e68c05c8774ea5795b708aca9d0d66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Yann E. MORIN\"" Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:11:44 +0000 Subject: Do a clean-up pass on the OBSOLETE features (versions): - remove legions of those, - remove associated patches no longer needed, - mark then as (OBSOLETE) in the prompt; --- patches/gcc/3.3.3/pr10412-1-test.patch | 46 ---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 46 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 patches/gcc/3.3.3/pr10412-1-test.patch (limited to 'patches/gcc/3.3.3/pr10412-1-test.patch') diff --git a/patches/gcc/3.3.3/pr10412-1-test.patch b/patches/gcc/3.3.3/pr10412-1-test.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 6ca05258..00000000 --- a/patches/gcc/3.3.3/pr10412-1-test.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,46 +0,0 @@ ---- /dev/null Sat Dec 14 13:56:51 2002 -+++ gcc-3.3.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr10412-1.c Sun Sep 14 16:15:21 2003 -@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ -+/* PR target/10412 -+ * Reporter: shrinivasa@kpitcummins.com -+ * Summary: Renesas SH - Incorrect code generation -+ * Description: -+ * When following code is compiled with -+ * sh-elf-gcc -S -mhitachi -m2 -O2 bug1.c -+ * generates an incorrect code. -+ * -+ * Testcase tweaked by dank@kegel.com -+ * Problem only happens with -mhitachi -m2. Not sure if I can give those -+ * options for all sh targets. They work on sh4, though. -+ * Not marked as xfail as it's a regression relative to hardhat 2.0 gcc-2.97. -+*/ -+/* { dg-do run } */ -+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ -+int global_val; -+ -+int func0(int x) -+{ -+ global_val += x; -+ return (x != 99); -+} -+ -+int func1(unsigned long addr) -+{ -+ int err; -+ -+ err = func0(addr); -+ if (err) -+ return (err); -+ -+ err = func0(addr * 7); /* address of func0 is lost during multiplication -> probable SIGSEGV */ -+ return (err); -+} -+ -+int main(int argc, char **argv) -+{ -+ global_val = 0; -+ global_val += func1(99); -+ if (global_val != 99 * 8 + 1) -+ abort(); -+ return 0; -+} -- cgit v1.2.3