From 84cf9c0f312637b670cc87224ff7e7c4da659e36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Samuel Thibault Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:20:42 +0200 Subject: Remove UFS support It has been unused/untested/unmaintained for a decade now, and its 4-clause BSD licence poses problem. * configure.ac (default_static): Remove ufs. * Makefile (prog-subdirs): Remove ufs, ufs-fsck and ufs-utils. * NEWS, TODO: doc/hurd.texi, doc/navigating: Remove UFS notes. * ufs: Remove directory * ufs-fsck: Remove directory * ufs-utils: Remove directory * bsdfsck: Remove directory --- doc/navigating | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc/navigating') diff --git a/doc/navigating b/doc/navigating index 2d836255..c000c56e 100644 --- a/doc/navigating +++ b/doc/navigating @@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ Most trivfs filesystems don't even do any filesystem stuff at all. See, for example, the null translator (trans/null.c) for a simple example of using trivfs. -diskfs is used for disk-based filesystems, with two in existence now: -ext2fs and ufs. If you write another diskfs-based filesystem, you -should DEFINITELY imitate the algorithms found in ext2fs and ufs; this +diskfs is used for disk-based filesystems, with one in existence now: +ext2fs. If you write another diskfs-based filesystem, you +should DEFINITELY imitate the algorithms found in ext2fs; this is crucial to getting locking right. netfs is used for nfs and other such things: with directories, and all -- cgit v1.2.3