From ac408ec86834ec6859f06099707da99d1d760317 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "jbranso@dismail.de" Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 09:53:01 -0400 Subject: faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info Message-Id: <20230517135301.3642-1-jbranso@dismail.de> --- faq/64-bit.mdwn | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'faq') diff --git a/faq/64-bit.mdwn b/faq/64-bit.mdwn index 2e1278cb..6cbcacd6 100644 --- a/faq/64-bit.mdwn +++ b/faq/64-bit.mdwn @@ -13,11 +13,18 @@ License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] [[!meta title="Is there a 64-bit version?"]] -There are currently no plan for 64-bit userland for the short term, but there -are plans for 64-bit kernelland with 32-bit userland, which will notably permit -to efficiently make use of more than 2 GiB memory and provide 4 GiB userland -addressing space. The kernel support was merged into GNU Mach, the currently -missing bit is the 32/64 mig translation for kernel RPCs. +There are plans for 64-bit kernelland with 32-bit userland, which will notably +permit to efficiently make use of more than 2 GiB memory and provide 4 GiB +userland addressing space. + +A 64-bit GNU/Hurd is also coming soon! Hurd developers ported GNUMach to +64-bit some time ago. Then they started making significant progress +on the x86_64 userland port in Feb 2023. As of May 2023, the 64-bit +port works well enough to start all the essential Hurd servers and run +/bin/sh. We are currently building 64-bit packages. We plan on +supporting both a 32-bit and 64-bit Debian GNU/Hurd. However, there +is no plan to fix the year 2038 concern on a 32-bit system. That being said, you can always run a 32-bit version on a 64-bit machine, it just works, processes are just limited to a couple GiB available memory. + -- cgit v1.2.3