From 4994d7ce199222dec1620389f9a942d9e5f26ffd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:30:56 +0100
Subject: open_issues/gcc: b401cb7ed15602d244a6807835b0b9d740a302a8
 (2012-11-26; 769bf18a20ee2540ca7601cdafabd62b18b9751b (2012-10-01))

---
 open_issues/automatic_backtraces_when_assertions_hit.mdwn | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

(limited to 'open_issues/automatic_backtraces_when_assertions_hit.mdwn')

diff --git a/open_issues/automatic_backtraces_when_assertions_hit.mdwn b/open_issues/automatic_backtraces_when_assertions_hit.mdwn
index 71007f99..f6bf5856 100644
--- a/open_issues/automatic_backtraces_when_assertions_hit.mdwn
+++ b/open_issues/automatic_backtraces_when_assertions_hit.mdwn
@@ -72,3 +72,8 @@ In context of the [[ext2fs_libports_reference_counting_assertion]].
     <braunr> yes, i thought it used the backtrace functions internally though
     <braunr> that is, execinfo
     <braunr> but this does require -rdynamic
+
+
+# GCC's libbacktrace
+
+Introduced in commit ecd3459e7bb829202601e3274411135a15c64dde.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3