From a167e7ae26b5159da570771ae39a6d56def1be7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:11:13 +0100
Subject: open_issues/fork_mach_port_mod_refs_ekern_urefs_owerflow: Update.

---
 open_issues/fork_mach_port_mod_refs_ekern_urefs_owerflow.mdwn | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'open_issues')

diff --git a/open_issues/fork_mach_port_mod_refs_ekern_urefs_owerflow.mdwn b/open_issues/fork_mach_port_mod_refs_ekern_urefs_owerflow.mdwn
index e80a5661..2bd0cd38 100644
--- a/open_issues/fork_mach_port_mod_refs_ekern_urefs_owerflow.mdwn
+++ b/open_issues/fork_mach_port_mod_refs_ekern_urefs_owerflow.mdwn
@@ -160,7 +160,14 @@ successfully.)
 
 [[!tag open_issue_glibc]]
 
+On 2010-11-30 and 2010-12-04, when I had again started the GCC testsuite, it
+failed again, but at another position (understandably), but with the same
+symptoms as shown below.  In particular, the `thread_refs` values were the same
+ones.
+
 
 # Discussion
 
-<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2010-11/msg00028.html>
+  * <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2010-11/msg00028.html>
+
+  * <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2010-12/msg00002.html>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3