aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer@gmail.com>2024-03-03 18:47:41 -0800
committerCopybara-Service <copybara-worker@google.com>2024-03-03 18:48:47 -0800
commit7bd9ff910d489658da58251de1317eb3f790a2c6 (patch)
tree554dff6206f81d6e788f4fbd10e629b3d89f1553 /absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc
parent7a4344511816e82234700795e7f2aaa80e85a119 (diff)
downloadabseil-7bd9ff910d489658da58251de1317eb3f790a2c6.tar.gz
abseil-7bd9ff910d489658da58251de1317eb3f790a2c6.tar.bz2
abseil-7bd9ff910d489658da58251de1317eb3f790a2c6.zip
PR #1632: inlined_vector: Use trivial relocation for `erase`
Imported from GitHub PR https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/pull/1632 Prior art for the `vector::erase` optimization: https://github.com/AmadeusITGroup/amc/blob/efcb7be/include/amc/vectorcommon.hpp#L176-L180 https://github.com/bloomberg/bde/blob/e15f05be6/groups/bsl/bslalg/bslalg_arrayprimitives.h#L3787-L3799 https://github.com/facebook/folly/blob/d24bf04/folly/FBVector.h#L1254-L1262 https://github.com/qt/qtbase/blob/fbfee2d/src/corelib/tools/qarraydataops.h#L856-L861 Merge 6ce011079ccf945ae95434ce45ea6c5e3a088af8 into 55d28d4b3b82f9a47b3fa9b811b675a032820621 Merging this change closes #1632 COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/pull/1632 from Quuxplusone:trivial-erase 6ce011079ccf945ae95434ce45ea6c5e3a088af8 PiperOrigin-RevId: 612278964 Change-Id: I327ace8a38292b4610c6be031cc334e77c76fd35
Diffstat (limited to 'absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc')
-rw-r--r--absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc51
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc b/absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc
index 5ecf88a9..6954262e 100644
--- a/absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc
+++ b/absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc
@@ -333,6 +333,57 @@ TEST(UniquePtr, Swap) {
}
}
+// Erasing from a container of unique pointers should work fine, with no
+// leaks, despite the fact that unique pointers are trivially relocatable but
+// not trivially destructible.
+// TODO(absl-team): Using unique_ptr here is technically correct, but
+// a trivially relocatable struct would be less semantically confusing.
+TEST(UniquePtr, EraseSingle) {
+ for (size_t size = 4; size < 16; ++size) {
+ absl::InlinedVector<std::unique_ptr<size_t>, 8> a;
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
+ a.push_back(std::make_unique<size_t>(i));
+ }
+ a.erase(a.begin());
+ ASSERT_THAT(a, SizeIs(size - 1));
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < size - 1; ++i) {
+ ASSERT_THAT(a[i], Pointee(i + 1));
+ }
+ a.erase(a.begin() + 2);
+ ASSERT_THAT(a, SizeIs(size - 2));
+ ASSERT_THAT(a[0], Pointee(1));
+ ASSERT_THAT(a[1], Pointee(2));
+ for (size_t i = 2; i < size - 2; ++i) {
+ ASSERT_THAT(a[i], Pointee(i + 2));
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// Erasing from a container of unique pointers should work fine, with no
+// leaks, despite the fact that unique pointers are trivially relocatable but
+// not trivially destructible.
+// TODO(absl-team): Using unique_ptr here is technically correct, but
+// a trivially relocatable struct would be less semantically confusing.
+TEST(UniquePtr, EraseMulti) {
+ for (size_t size = 5; size < 16; ++size) {
+ absl::InlinedVector<std::unique_ptr<size_t>, 8> a;
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
+ a.push_back(std::make_unique<size_t>(i));
+ }
+ a.erase(a.begin(), a.begin() + 2);
+ ASSERT_THAT(a, SizeIs(size - 2));
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < size - 2; ++i) {
+ ASSERT_THAT(a[i], Pointee(i + 2));
+ }
+ a.erase(a.begin() + 1, a.begin() + 3);
+ ASSERT_THAT(a, SizeIs(size - 4));
+ ASSERT_THAT(a[0], Pointee(2));
+ for (size_t i = 1; i < size - 4; ++i) {
+ ASSERT_THAT(a[i], Pointee(i + 4));
+ }
+ }
+}
+
// At the end of this test loop, the elements between [erase_begin, erase_end)
// should have reference counts == 0, and all others elements should have
// reference counts == 1.