diff options
author | Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer@gmail.com> | 2024-03-03 18:47:41 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Copybara-Service <copybara-worker@google.com> | 2024-03-03 18:48:47 -0800 |
commit | 7bd9ff910d489658da58251de1317eb3f790a2c6 (patch) | |
tree | 554dff6206f81d6e788f4fbd10e629b3d89f1553 /absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc | |
parent | 7a4344511816e82234700795e7f2aaa80e85a119 (diff) | |
download | abseil-7bd9ff910d489658da58251de1317eb3f790a2c6.tar.gz abseil-7bd9ff910d489658da58251de1317eb3f790a2c6.tar.bz2 abseil-7bd9ff910d489658da58251de1317eb3f790a2c6.zip |
PR #1632: inlined_vector: Use trivial relocation for `erase`
Imported from GitHub PR https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/pull/1632
Prior art for the `vector::erase` optimization:
https://github.com/AmadeusITGroup/amc/blob/efcb7be/include/amc/vectorcommon.hpp#L176-L180 https://github.com/bloomberg/bde/blob/e15f05be6/groups/bsl/bslalg/bslalg_arrayprimitives.h#L3787-L3799 https://github.com/facebook/folly/blob/d24bf04/folly/FBVector.h#L1254-L1262 https://github.com/qt/qtbase/blob/fbfee2d/src/corelib/tools/qarraydataops.h#L856-L861
Merge 6ce011079ccf945ae95434ce45ea6c5e3a088af8 into 55d28d4b3b82f9a47b3fa9b811b675a032820621
Merging this change closes #1632
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/pull/1632 from Quuxplusone:trivial-erase 6ce011079ccf945ae95434ce45ea6c5e3a088af8
PiperOrigin-RevId: 612278964
Change-Id: I327ace8a38292b4610c6be031cc334e77c76fd35
Diffstat (limited to 'absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc | 51 |
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc b/absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc index 5ecf88a9..6954262e 100644 --- a/absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc +++ b/absl/container/inlined_vector_test.cc @@ -333,6 +333,57 @@ TEST(UniquePtr, Swap) { } } +// Erasing from a container of unique pointers should work fine, with no +// leaks, despite the fact that unique pointers are trivially relocatable but +// not trivially destructible. +// TODO(absl-team): Using unique_ptr here is technically correct, but +// a trivially relocatable struct would be less semantically confusing. +TEST(UniquePtr, EraseSingle) { + for (size_t size = 4; size < 16; ++size) { + absl::InlinedVector<std::unique_ptr<size_t>, 8> a; + for (size_t i = 0; i < size; ++i) { + a.push_back(std::make_unique<size_t>(i)); + } + a.erase(a.begin()); + ASSERT_THAT(a, SizeIs(size - 1)); + for (size_t i = 0; i < size - 1; ++i) { + ASSERT_THAT(a[i], Pointee(i + 1)); + } + a.erase(a.begin() + 2); + ASSERT_THAT(a, SizeIs(size - 2)); + ASSERT_THAT(a[0], Pointee(1)); + ASSERT_THAT(a[1], Pointee(2)); + for (size_t i = 2; i < size - 2; ++i) { + ASSERT_THAT(a[i], Pointee(i + 2)); + } + } +} + +// Erasing from a container of unique pointers should work fine, with no +// leaks, despite the fact that unique pointers are trivially relocatable but +// not trivially destructible. +// TODO(absl-team): Using unique_ptr here is technically correct, but +// a trivially relocatable struct would be less semantically confusing. +TEST(UniquePtr, EraseMulti) { + for (size_t size = 5; size < 16; ++size) { + absl::InlinedVector<std::unique_ptr<size_t>, 8> a; + for (size_t i = 0; i < size; ++i) { + a.push_back(std::make_unique<size_t>(i)); + } + a.erase(a.begin(), a.begin() + 2); + ASSERT_THAT(a, SizeIs(size - 2)); + for (size_t i = 0; i < size - 2; ++i) { + ASSERT_THAT(a[i], Pointee(i + 2)); + } + a.erase(a.begin() + 1, a.begin() + 3); + ASSERT_THAT(a, SizeIs(size - 4)); + ASSERT_THAT(a[0], Pointee(2)); + for (size_t i = 1; i < size - 4; ++i) { + ASSERT_THAT(a[i], Pointee(i + 4)); + } + } +} + // At the end of this test loop, the elements between [erase_begin, erase_end) // should have reference counts == 0, and all others elements should have // reference counts == 1. |