diff options
| author | Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> | 2020-05-01 15:27:50 +1200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> | 2020-05-01 15:27:50 +1200 |
| commit | 1b29292f897f28b3ffc55cb7e254fba040b078cf (patch) | |
| tree | 23aef4da374b0be6a466a9335e00f4921b90b32d /packages/gcc/8.4.0/0015-crystax.patch | |
| parent | 5659366bf62b5555bf914b5f55e8a01c92d6c6f1 (diff) | |
| download | crosstool-ng-1b29292f897f28b3ffc55cb7e254fba040b078cf.tar.gz crosstool-ng-1b29292f897f28b3ffc55cb7e254fba040b078cf.tar.bz2 crosstool-ng-1b29292f897f28b3ffc55cb7e254fba040b078cf.zip | |
gcc: Remove nested 8.3.0 directory
When GCC was updated to 8.4.0 the patches were moved incorrectly. Fix
this now so that they will be picked up.
Fixes: commit 31ca84ac ("Update to gcc 8.4.0")
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'packages/gcc/8.4.0/0015-crystax.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | packages/gcc/8.4.0/0015-crystax.patch | 33 |
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/packages/gcc/8.4.0/0015-crystax.patch b/packages/gcc/8.4.0/0015-crystax.patch new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2424d2b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/packages/gcc/8.4.0/0015-crystax.patch @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +commit 8a66d422721ae5999737d7825701ff22097d287b +Author: Andrew Hsieh <andrewhsieh@google.com> +Date: Mon Apr 14 21:05:51 2014 -0700 + + [android] Fix ARM generates insufficient alignment for NEON vst/vld + + See d909af3e2469aad87d5c3e79b93c778fd26c03a9 + + Change-Id: Ie1de9f946f397196bb6f1623f5add86933739484 + Signed-off-by: Dmitry Moskalchuk <dm@crystax.net> + +--- + gcc/config/arm/arm.c | 8 ++++++-- + 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c ++++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c +@@ -22619,9 +22619,13 @@ + memsize = MEM_SIZE (x); + + /* Only certain alignment specifiers are supported by the hardware. */ +- if (memsize == 32 && (align % 32) == 0) ++ /* Note that ARM EABI only guarentees 8-byte stack alignment. While GCC ++ honors stricter alignment of composite type in user code, it doesn't ++ observe the alignment of memory passed as an extra argument for function ++ returning large composite type. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271 */ ++ if (memsize == 32 && (align % 32) == 0 && !TARGET_AAPCS_BASED) + align_bits = 256; +- else if ((memsize == 16 || memsize == 32) && (align % 16) == 0) ++ else if ((memsize == 16 || memsize == 32) && (align % 16) == 0 && !TARGET_AAPCS_BASED) + align_bits = 128; + else if (memsize >= 8 && (align % 8) == 0) + align_bits = 64; |