diff options
| author | Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <hegtvedt@cisco.com> | 2020-03-13 10:31:08 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <hegtvedt@cisco.com> | 2020-08-27 11:35:59 +0200 |
| commit | b0c0005f8a056afed06d663bb4e15f5dbd32e973 (patch) | |
| tree | 26ed90307a37e6381d2590a9ce52218a41aa69c3 /packages/gcc/9.2.0/0015-crystax.patch | |
| parent | c0f2d7016b7032b29b5d5b401d5c4f4d24822719 (diff) | |
| download | crosstool-ng-b0c0005f8a056afed06d663bb4e15f5dbd32e973.tar.gz crosstool-ng-b0c0005f8a056afed06d663bb4e15f5dbd32e973.tar.bz2 crosstool-ng-b0c0005f8a056afed06d663bb4e15f5dbd32e973.zip | |
Update to GCC 9.x to latest release 9.3.0
Forward ported patches from GCC 9.2.0 to 9.3.0, refreshed to match
current sources.
Patch 0010-crystax.patch did not apply clean and had minor adjustments
to fit new GCC 9.3.0 release.
Signed-off-by: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <hegtvedt@cisco.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'packages/gcc/9.2.0/0015-crystax.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | packages/gcc/9.2.0/0015-crystax.patch | 33 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/packages/gcc/9.2.0/0015-crystax.patch b/packages/gcc/9.2.0/0015-crystax.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 2b51260d..00000000 --- a/packages/gcc/9.2.0/0015-crystax.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,33 +0,0 @@ -commit 8a66d422721ae5999737d7825701ff22097d287b -Author: Andrew Hsieh <andrewhsieh@google.com> -Date: Mon Apr 14 21:05:51 2014 -0700 - - [android] Fix ARM generates insufficient alignment for NEON vst/vld - - See d909af3e2469aad87d5c3e79b93c778fd26c03a9 - - Change-Id: Ie1de9f946f397196bb6f1623f5add86933739484 - Signed-off-by: Dmitry Moskalchuk <dm@crystax.net> - ---- - gcc/config/arm/arm.c | 8 ++++++-- - 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - ---- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c -+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c -@@ -22781,9 +22781,13 @@ arm_print_operand (FILE *stream, rtx x, - memsize = MEM_SIZE (x); - - /* Only certain alignment specifiers are supported by the hardware. */ -- if (memsize == 32 && (align % 32) == 0) -+ /* Note that ARM EABI only guarentees 8-byte stack alignment. While GCC -+ honors stricter alignment of composite type in user code, it doesn't -+ observe the alignment of memory passed as an extra argument for function -+ returning large composite type. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271 */ -+ if (memsize == 32 && (align % 32) == 0 && !TARGET_AAPCS_BASED) - align_bits = 256; -- else if ((memsize == 16 || memsize == 32) && (align % 16) == 0) -+ else if ((memsize == 16 || memsize == 32) && (align % 16) == 0 && !TARGET_AAPCS_BASED) - align_bits = 128; - else if (memsize >= 8 && (align % 8) == 0) - align_bits = 64; |