1 files changed, 0 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/packages/gcc/14.2.0/0016-Revert-one-of-the-force_subreg-changes.patch b/packages/gcc/14.2.0/0016-Revert-one-of-the-force_subreg-changes.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 629cfbda..00000000
--- a/packages/gcc/14.2.0/0016-Revert-one-of-the-force_subreg-changes.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
-From 5468439a1f987b7d801c6c76d6c989e57af8916a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:41:21 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH 16/16] Revert one of the force_subreg changes
-
-One of the changes in g:d4047da6a070175aae7121c739d1cad6b08ff4b2
-caused a regression in ft32-elf; see:
-
-    https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/655418.html
-
-for details.  This change was different from the others in that the
-original call was to simplify_subreg rather than simplify_lowpart_subreg.
-The old code would therefore go on to do the force_reg for more cases
-than the new code would.
-
-gcc/
-	* expmed.cc (store_bit_field_using_insv): Revert earlier change
-	to use force_subreg instead of simplify_gen_subreg.
-
-(cherry picked from commit b694bf417cdd7d0a4d78e9927bab6bc202b7df6c)
----
- gcc/expmed.cc | 8 +++++++-
- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/gcc/expmed.cc b/gcc/expmed.cc
-index bd190722de6..85ec2614a3f 100644
---- a/gcc/expmed.cc
-+++ b/gcc/expmed.cc
-@@ -695,7 +695,13 @@ store_bit_field_using_insv (const extraction_insn *insv, rtx op0,
- 	     if we must narrow it, be sure we do it correctly.  */
- 
- 	  if (GET_MODE_SIZE (value_mode) < GET_MODE_SIZE (op_mode))
--	    tmp = force_subreg (op_mode, value1, value_mode, 0);
-+	    {
-+	      tmp = simplify_subreg (op_mode, value1, value_mode, 0);
-+	      if (! tmp)
-+		tmp = simplify_gen_subreg (op_mode,
-+					   force_reg (value_mode, value1),
-+					   value_mode, 0);
-+	    }
- 	  else
- 	    {
- 	      tmp = gen_lowpart_if_possible (op_mode, value1);
--- 
-2.44.2
-