rename open_issues.mdwn to service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663.mdwn

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 34 deletions

diff --git a/open_issues/bsd_compatibility.mdwn b/open_issues/bsd_compatibility.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index 5c916908..00000000
--- a/open_issues/bsd_compatibility.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
-
-[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
-id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
-document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
-any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
-Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
-is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
-License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
-
-[[!tag open_issue_documentation]]
-
-IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-10-12:
-
-    <pinotree> hm, why our sys/param.h #define's BSD?
-    <braunr> pinotree: because we're evil
-    <pinotree> is that correct?
-    <pinotree> (the define, not the evilness)
-    <braunr> pinotree: i think it's because the Hurd is closer to the BSD
-      interfaces, probably because of Mach (which is itself derived from
-      BSD4.2)
-    <pinotree> braunr: but mach being bsd-ish won't make the userland (glibc)
-      interfaces bsd-ish, will it?
-    <braunr> pinotree: no
-    <pinotree> braunr: so...? :)
-    <braunr> pinotree: i guesse there are bsdisms in the glibc hurd specific
-      code, possibly because of mach
-    <braunr> or they used to be bsdisms, before being standardized
-    <braunr> e.g. mmap
-    <pinotree> braunr: hrmm...
-    <antrik> braunr: the BSDisms are there on purpose... Hurd was originally
-      even meant to be binary-compatible with BSD
-    <antrik> nothing to do with Mach really
-    <braunr> antrik: ok