IRC.

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/open_issues/mach-defpager_vs_defpager.mdwn b/open_issues/mach-defpager_vs_defpager.mdwn
index d6976706..f03bc67f 100644
--- a/open_issues/mach-defpager_vs_defpager.mdwn
+++ b/open_issues/mach-defpager_vs_defpager.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
 
 [[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
 id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
@@ -10,16 +10,24 @@ License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
 
 [[!tag open_issue_gnumach open_issue_hurd]]
 
-\#hurd, 2010, end of May / beginning of June
+IRC, freenode, #hurd, end of May/beginning of June 2010
 
     <cfhammar> whats the difference between mach-defpager and defpager?
-    <cfhammar> i'm guessing defpager is a hurdish version that uses libstore but was never finished or something
-    <cfhammar> found an interesting thread about it: http://mirror.libre.fm/hurd/list/msg01232.html
+    <cfhammar> i'm guessing defpager is a hurdish version that uses libstore
+      but was never finished or something
+    <cfhammar> found an interesting thread about it:
+      http://mirror.libre.fm/hurd/list/msg01232.html
     <slpz> antrik: an interesting thread, indeed :-)
-    <pochu> slpz: btw is mach-defpager linked statically but not called mach-defpager.static on purpose?
-    <slpz> antrik: also, I can confirm that mach-defpager needs a complete rewrite ;-)
+    <pochu> slpz: btw is mach-defpager linked statically but not called
+      mach-defpager.static on purpose?
+    <slpz> antrik: also, I can confirm that mach-defpager needs a complete
+      rewrite ;-)
     <slpz> pochu: I think the original defpager was launched by serverboot
     <slpz> pochu: that could be the reason to have it static, like ext2fs
-    <slpz> and since there's no need to execute it again during the normal operation of the system, they probably decided to not create a dynamically linked version
+    <slpz> and since there's no need to execute it again during the normal
+      operation of the system, they probably decided to not create a
+      dynamically linked version
     <slpz> (but I'm just guessing)
-    <slpz> of perhaps they wanted to prevent mach-defpager from the need of reading libraries, since it's used when memory is really scarce (guessing again)
+    <slpz> of perhaps they wanted to prevent mach-defpager from the need of
+      reading libraries, since it's used when memory is really scarce (guessing
+      again)