Revert "rename open_issues.mdwn to service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663.mdwn"

This reverts commit 95878586ec7611791f4001a4ee17abf943fae3c1.

1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/open_issues/strict_aliasing.mdwn b/open_issues/strict_aliasing.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0e59f796
--- /dev/null
+++ b/open_issues/strict_aliasing.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+
+[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
+id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
+Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
+is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
+License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
+
+[[!tag open_issue_glibc open_issue_gnumach open_issue_hurd open_issue_mig]]
+
+
+# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-07-04
+
+    <braunr> we should perhaps build the hurd with -fno-strict-aliasing,
+      considering the number of warnings i can see during the build :/
+    <pinotree> braunr: wouldn't be better to "just" fix the mig-generated stubs
+      instead?
+    <braunr> pinotree: if we can rely on gcc for the warnings, yes
+    <braunr> but i suspect there might be other silent issues in very old code
+
+
+# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-07-12
+
+    <braunr> btw, i'm building glibc right now, and i can see a few strict
+      aliasing warnings
+    <braunr> fixing them will allow us to avoid wasting time on very obscure
+      issues (if gcc catches them all)
+    <tschwinge> The strict aliasing things should be fixed, yes.  Some might be
+      from MIG.
+
+
+# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-10-17
+
+    <braunr> we should build gnumach and the hurd with -fno-strict-aliasing
+    <pinotree> aren't the mig-generated stubs the only issues related to that?
+    <braunr> no
+    <teythoon> b/c we often have pointers of different type pointing to the
+      same address? for example code using libports?
+    <braunr> the old linux code, including pfinet, and even the hurd libraries,
+      use techniques that assume aliasing
+    <braunr> exactly
+    <teythoon> right, I agree