rename open_issues.mdwn to service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663.mdwn

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 54 deletions

diff --git a/open_issues/subhurd_vs_proc_server.mdwn b/open_issues/subhurd_vs_proc_server.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index 36d150f8..00000000
--- a/open_issues/subhurd_vs_proc_server.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
-
-[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
-id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
-document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
-any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
-Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
-is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
-License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
-
-[[!tag open_issue_hurd]]
-
-
-# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-02-09
-
-    <youpi> also, can you actually gdb a process of another subhurd?
-    <braunr> yes
-    <youpi> but you need to talk to its proc server, don't you?
-    <braunr> i don't know
-    <braunr> but i did it several times
-    <youpi> how?
-    <braunr> the usual way
-    <braunr> gdb /path/to/bin pid
-    <youpi> but which pid?
-    <braunr> the hard part was finding the right pid
-    <youpi> well, gdb still needs to talk with the right proc too
-    <braunr> i don't think it does
-    <youpi> btw about the "unable to adjust libports thread priority" errors
-      I'm seeing on the buildd consoles
-    <braunr> from what i've seen, proc "creates" tasks when it first sees them
-      too
-    <youpi> it's about the destination port
-    <braunr> yes
-    <braunr> i have those when starting a subhurd too
-    <youpi> so it would mean that proc somehow got bogus
-    <youpi> ah
-    <youpi> so  you can actually use your own proc
-    <braunr> yes
-    <braunr> and it feels bogus to me
-    <youpi> and I guess mach lets that proc access the task because your proc
-      is privileged
-    <braunr> probably
-    <braunr> it feels bogus because, you can't rely on pids being allocated per
-      task
-    <braunr> what i mean is that, if some tasks spawn and die quickly
-    <braunr> and you start another application running long enough to see it in
-      ps
-    <braunr> it's pid will be +1, not +the number of created tasks
-    <braunr> which means the proc server will never have seen those previous
-      tasks
-    <braunr> it's minor but a bit confusing
-    <braunr> i personally don't like seeing the tasks of other systems in ps :/
-    <braunr> and despite the ability to use gdb from another hurd, i think we
-      should improve the intra system debugging tools