1 files changed, 0 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/open_issues/wayland.mdwn b/open_issues/wayland.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index 67f78b1d..00000000
--- a/open_issues/wayland.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
-
-[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
-id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
-document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
-any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
-Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
-is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
-License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
-
-[[!tag open_issue_porting]]
-
-IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-18:
-
-    <antrik> Wayland should be very portable. all the system dependencies are
-      in the infrastructure, such as DRI
-    <antrik> we have had a DRI task (for X.Org) for years
-    <antrik> (in fact I would be the right person to implement this,
-      considering my background -- by quite frankly, I doubt I'll ever do it)
-    <tschwinge> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/Hurd_Porting
-
-IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-20:
-
-    <youlysses> Is wayland something that will be semi-easy to port to the
-      hurd? I saw GNOME is heading in this direction.
-    <pinotree> wayland at the moment is linux only
-    <tschwinge> youlysses: A DRI implementation will be needed.
-    <pinotree> that, and libdrm compiling
-    <youlysses> So it will take some work ... but theres no *HUGE* design
-      decison that would inhibit it?
-    <pinotree> i know it uses epoll, for instance
-    <tschwinge> youlysses: I cannot judge how complex a DRI system is, and how
-      much needs to be designed vs. implemented.